True Crime Jeffery Epstein believed by most of America to have been murdered; that New York bail law.
Jeffery Epstein's Female Pimp Reportedly an Israel spy.
The story of Jeffery Epstein is an intriguing true crime. He would bring famous people, to include Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, to his own island to enjoy the joys of younger flesh.
Supposedly he had a female who rounded up appropriate female flesh for the men.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7843659/Ghislaine-Maxwell-reportedly-foreign-spy-hiding-Israel.html
An explosive new report has asserted that deceased sex criminal Jeffery Epstein and his alleged 'madame' Ghislaine Maxwell were foreign intelligence 'assets', and that she is currently hiding in a safehouse in Israel.
'Ghislaine is protected. She and Jeffrey were assets of sorts for multiple foreign governments. They would trade information about the powerful people caught in his net — caught at Epstein's house,' a unnamed source told Page Six.
Maxwell, 58, has been accused in lawsuits of procuring underage girls for Epstein to sexually traffick among his wealthy and powerful friends, and is reportedly the subject of an ongoing FBI probe.
----------------------------------
Americans Believe Epstein Was Murdered
So Epstein finally landed in jail for his crimes against under-aged females. Within a few days of wearing an orange suit, Epstein was found dead in his cell.
Nobody with any brains believes this man killed himself.
Nor do I.
https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffcrouere/2020/01/12/americans-believe-epstein-was-murdered-n2559377
While the media and government officials have repeatedly assured the country that Epstein committed suicide in his prison cell on August 10, 2019, the American people are not convinced. A new Rasmussen Reports survey indicates that only 21% of the American people believe that Epstein killed himself. While 27% are undecided, most respondents, 52%, believe that Epstein was murdered.
--------------------------
No, repairing the disastrous criminal-justice ‘reforms’ (in New York) isn’t about bringing back bail
I admit I am not entirely sure what this New York bail reform is all about. I think the gist of it is that many crimes which required cash bail or a lock up until trial will no longer be handled in that matter.
This article asserts this is not the case.
https://nypost.com/2020/01/11/no-repairing-the-disastrous-criminal-justice-reforms-isnt-about-bringing-back-bail/
Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and other backers of New York’s criminal-justice reforms want to pretend that fixing its flaws means fully restoring cash bail. Don’t buy it for a minute. At a pro-reform event last week with Williams, Akeem Browder — whose teen brother, Kalief, spent three years in jail awaiting trial before being freed and committing suicide two years later — insisted the reforms “came too late to help Kalief.”
Added Darryl Herring of VOCAL-NY, who spent 18 months at Rikers: “Wealth should not determine one’s freedom.” That’s true — but wealth was never really a big factor: A defendant’s finances generally figured in the bail amount. And bail bonds required defendants to come up with only a fraction of what judges set. Besides, Kalief Browder was actually held not for lack of funds but because he was arrested while on probation from a previous case. Yet that’s all mostly beside the point, because fixing the reform’s dangerous flaws isn’t about restoring cash bail for everyone who became eligible. We’re not calling for that; nor are most of the many district attorneys, judges and law-enforcement folks who demand changes. No, fixing the law is about ensuring public safety. Period.
Lawmakers need to give judges discretion to keep people accused of serious crimes locked up based on their threat to the community — especially if they’re not going to demand a cash deposit (i.e., bail) to deter them from committing new crimes and to ensure they return for trial. Bail, after all, has a public-safety dimension, even if it’s mostly meant to prevent the accused from fleeing.
-----------------------------------
She finds a presidential contender molesting a child. What can she do?
The story of Jeffery Epstein is an intriguing true crime. He would bring famous people, to include Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, to his own island to enjoy the joys of younger flesh.
Supposedly he had a female who rounded up appropriate female flesh for the men.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7843659/Ghislaine-Maxwell-reportedly-foreign-spy-hiding-Israel.html
An explosive new report has asserted that deceased sex criminal Jeffery Epstein and his alleged 'madame' Ghislaine Maxwell were foreign intelligence 'assets', and that she is currently hiding in a safehouse in Israel.
'Ghislaine is protected. She and Jeffrey were assets of sorts for multiple foreign governments. They would trade information about the powerful people caught in his net — caught at Epstein's house,' a unnamed source told Page Six.
Maxwell, 58, has been accused in lawsuits of procuring underage girls for Epstein to sexually traffick among his wealthy and powerful friends, and is reportedly the subject of an ongoing FBI probe.
Americans Believe Epstein Was Murdered
So Epstein finally landed in jail for his crimes against under-aged females. Within a few days of wearing an orange suit, Epstein was found dead in his cell.
Nobody with any brains believes this man killed himself.
Nor do I.
https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffcrouere/2020/01/12/americans-believe-epstein-was-murdered-n2559377
While the media and government officials have repeatedly assured the country that Epstein committed suicide in his prison cell on August 10, 2019, the American people are not convinced. A new Rasmussen Reports survey indicates that only 21% of the American people believe that Epstein killed himself. While 27% are undecided, most respondents, 52%, believe that Epstein was murdered.
--------------------------
No, repairing the disastrous criminal-justice ‘reforms’ (in New York) isn’t about bringing back bail
I admit I am not entirely sure what this New York bail reform is all about. I think the gist of it is that many crimes which required cash bail or a lock up until trial will no longer be handled in that matter.
This article asserts this is not the case.
https://nypost.com/2020/01/11/no-repairing-the-disastrous-criminal-justice-reforms-isnt-about-bringing-back-bail/
Public Advocate Jumaane Williams and other backers of New York’s criminal-justice reforms want to pretend that fixing its flaws means fully restoring cash bail. Don’t buy it for a minute. At a pro-reform event last week with Williams, Akeem Browder — whose teen brother, Kalief, spent three years in jail awaiting trial before being freed and committing suicide two years later — insisted the reforms “came too late to help Kalief.”
Added Darryl Herring of VOCAL-NY, who spent 18 months at Rikers: “Wealth should not determine one’s freedom.” That’s true — but wealth was never really a big factor: A defendant’s finances generally figured in the bail amount. And bail bonds required defendants to come up with only a fraction of what judges set. Besides, Kalief Browder was actually held not for lack of funds but because he was arrested while on probation from a previous case. Yet that’s all mostly beside the point, because fixing the reform’s dangerous flaws isn’t about restoring cash bail for everyone who became eligible. We’re not calling for that; nor are most of the many district attorneys, judges and law-enforcement folks who demand changes. No, fixing the law is about ensuring public safety. Period.
Lawmakers need to give judges discretion to keep people accused of serious crimes locked up based on their threat to the community — especially if they’re not going to demand a cash deposit (i.e., bail) to deter them from committing new crimes and to ensure they return for trial. Bail, after all, has a public-safety dimension, even if it’s mostly meant to prevent the accused from fleeing.
-----------------------------------
She finds a presidential contender molesting a child. What can she do?
Comments
Post a Comment